In terms of infrastructure, it is not being reduced. This committee is familiar from years ago when we were presenting on infrastructure spending. The planned spending doesn't always match with what gets built so the money gets carried forward into future years. That's what's happening on infrastructure. It's the same thing with the disaster financial assistance program. The provinces have to submit the bills to us as to what they incurred as part of a disaster, and that's when we pay them. There's usually a lag between what the plan is because we have to plan for everybody getting everything done. But it never works that way, so then money gets pushed to other years. It's the nature of the business in those things.
There's one thing I'd like to say on why EI was removed. Mr. Matthews was working with this committee. He had many appearances in terms of how to improve the main estimates and the estimates process. What he heard from the people who worked for this committee is that this particular number in the estimates was confusing because nothing ended up being added up. We thought it was a technical improvement that got made to these. Clearly, it's causing some issues for the committee. The intention, from the public service perspective, was Mr. Matthews trying to respond to the needs of this committee. Clearly, that probably missed the communications element of that.