Would you include the F-35 in that category? I was a member of the public accounts committee when officials from this Conservative government sat at the table and vehemently defended a fighter jet that did not exist and that was increasing in cost and that seemed to be increasingly unsupportable. Would you categorize the F-35 in that very same way, as being intended equipment that was non-existent?
On March 27th, 2014. See this statement in context.