First of all, I want to congratulate the government. I agree with Don. It's small steps. It's great to have a data portal, but you asked me whether it's relevant, useful. So here goes. I'll give you a candid answer. When I was looking through CivicAccess, an online user group of users of data, I happened on a Twitter trail that said that one of the most popular data sets was caribou trails or migration patterns. I've never seen a caribou in Toronto. I don't know if Robert has seen one in Ottawa.
So there's the whole issue of making sure there are data relevant to social issues. I come from the social realm. Someone on the infrastructure end might talk about transportation data. There are data out there that you've picked, which is great, it's low-hanging fruit, but begin to think about data in terms of what people need, what service agencies need as well. There's that angle.
The other piece, and Don talked about it as well, is geography. The data to us in municipalities is not as useful if it is only at the city or even provincial level as a geographic layer of data. We need data at smaller levels of geography. StatsCan does this already. I'll be technical for a moment. Census tracks, dissemination areas, the geography is there. You have a federal department in StatsCan that has a file that can link and aggregate data to many different levels of geography. Use it. Use StatsCan to bridge that link across federal data sets and provide some of that data at different levels of geography. It'd be meaningful to us and users of geomatics across the board.