Okay.
Mr. Lenihan, you mentioned earlier that we'll be making better public policy decisions because we'll have more information at our disposal.
I would tend to agree with that. However—and Mr. Low may also want to come into this—do we not run the risk, first of all, of policy paralysis when we have too much data at our disposal, because the information is just coming out of a fire hose and we don't know when it's going to end and when enough is enough? Also, secondly, I foresee a bigger problem. Because we're relying only on empirical data, do we not lose the fact that for the big policy decisions in Canadian history, like those on national medicare, building a railroad, or these big vision things, no data was available? Those were based on somebody's vision of where they wanted to take our country. Do we not lose that if we rely too much on the information and the empirical evidence?
Could you address those two things?
Then, maybe, Mr. Low, you could chime in too.