Just as a quick comment, I hear you, Mr. Low, about the long-form census data. I come from a research background. It's basically a national tragedy that we've lost so much useful data. It's really unfortunate. We've called on this government to reinstate it, but there seems to be some resistance there, for unknown reasons.
I want to come back to two things. One of them is access to information and the relationship between open government and access to information. Unfortunately, there's a lot of frustration with regard to access to information out there, particularly the practices of this government—how the act is being applied, delays, etc. There's a relationship, I think, between reducing the amount of access to information and the accessibility of data. I think if you make useful data open by default, then there's a potential to reduce access to information requests. It could wind up saving taxpayers money, really, and a lot of frustration with regard to journalists, etc., trying to find information.
Just your comments on that relationship between access to information practices and open government would be greatly appreciated.