Thanks very much for the question. It's a great question.
What we know for sure is that all data has errors in it. Some of them were created, some of them occurred when the data was collected, and some of them were created and built-in as the data was put together. What we've found though is that the more sets of eyes on the data the higher the quality becomes. So it's actually improved as we've started to open it up because as people, particularly public servants, start to look at it they question missing data, they question anomalies that don't seem to make sense. So it's improved the quality of the data. Yes, we do have concerns, absolutely, that the data isn't perfect, but we understand that a lot of the people working with it are giving us some grace in terms of understanding that it won't be perfect and the quality is improving as more sets of eyes look at it.