Thank you.
Mr. Chair and committee members…
first, let me explain that geo-data is the basic geographic or geoscience data that describes Canada’s land mass. Some notable examples of this kind of information include geological information about where mines are and where you can find particular mineral deposits. There are topographic maps. For those of you who have cottages, you have probably used these topographic maps, which include data about things like water, lakes, roads, elevation, and all kinds of important data points that are becoming increasingly important in an open data environment.
The key distinguishing aspect of these data is that they are all defined by a location or position on the earth. Additionally, they are often relevant in multiple applications, ranging from property rights, to government policy decisions, to regulatory decisions, to environmental assessments, to estimating resource potential, and even right down to in-car GPS navigation, making sure that the pizza guy gets to the house within 20 minutes.
In the early days, the most useful form possible generally meant recording this kind of data on paper maps. Over time, we progressed to managing our geo-data holdings in NRCan as digital files on computers, although the final product was still paper maps.
I want to give recognition to Canadian leadership in this regard. Roger Tomlinson actually invented geographic information systems back in NRCan in 1964, so we've had a leadership role internationally and helped to spawn and create a multi-billion dollar industry worldwide.
Today, we make raw digital data, also known as machine-readable data, accessible over the Internet in forms that can be manipulated, combined, and transformed according to need. This is really at the hub of the concept of big data and big data analytics. Many departments and agencies make significant investments to collect and manage their geospatial information, but for various reasons, barriers exist that have prevented the timely sharing and integration of this information across the federal family and with partners. That's why we welcome the open data initiative.
Working together across government, the federal committee on geomatics and earth observations—the FCGEO, as it's called—is an ADM-level committee consisting of 21 departments and agencies working in very close collaboration with Treasury Board and the chief information officer, who's been directing overall government efforts with respect to open data under the guidance of Minister Clement. What we've been doing is working to break down barriers and capitalize on the full potential of the government’s geospatial data and holdings.
The Federal Committee on Geomatics and Earth Observations, the FCGEO, consists of producers and/or consumers of geospatial data that are voluntarily collaborating in this broad federal effort. They have adopted an inclusive, open and transparent approach with each other in the interest of not just the federal government, but for the benefit of all Canadians. Recognition of the power and potential of new technologies and media, and of the importance of authoritative, open data to Canada's knowledge economy and global competitiveness was also key to moving this initiative forward.
Together, we are currently working towards a federal geospatial platform that will make federal government geo-data available through the government's open data portal, as well as support the sharing and reuse of data within the government.
With more than 10 years of experience in open geo-data, and one of the first public organizations in the world in the geospatial space to go open, NRCan's earth sciences sector has learned many lessons, although please remember our starting point that Pierre talked about. It goes back to 1842. It's been really hard work.
The work of surveyors and mappers really took a very structured and disciplined approach to how it is we collected the data, how it is we managed the data, and how it is we made it accessible. So there was a very highly structured approach that made it usable and actually facilitated the value-added dimension to the digital data we now produce.
NRCan has always intended that the geo-data it collects and manages be used by governments, industries, and citizens. Let me give you a practical example. The surveyors that went out in the old Department of the Interior, which preceded NRCan, actually helped us define our boundaries. It helped us shape our country, so it was absolutely essential that we communicated that to Canadians and to the world generally. It helped define our borders.
Coming back to the open data portal, NRCan was the principal contributor to the Government of Canada's open data portal pilot project when it was launched in March 2011 as part of the open government strategy. More than 90% of the available open data at that time was geospatial, originating from NRCan.
What has producing open data meant for NRCan? First, we've actually realized some savings because we don't need to have physical storage space or a vast distribution network to disseminate our physical products. We make our products, our data, available to such key players as Google and Google is able to disseminate our data in Google maps. It uses our data.
I understand you had Colin McKay before you a few weeks back. Colin would say that the partnership of Google and NRCan is one of the best partnerships they have between a federal government and Google.
However, there are new costs for maintaining servers, bandwidths, licences, and for uploading data files.
We have learned that accessible, free data are very much in demand. For example, geo-data downloads were less than one million a year in 2007 from our GeoGratis website and are now in the order of five million downloads last year, plus another two and a half million from our federal, provincial, territorial GeoBase website.
Just to recap, it was less than a million before we went open and between five and seven million after we went open, not of access points or hits, but downloads of our geospatial data. They're impressive numbers, but they're not downloads of interesting pictures or video clips. Most of these downloads are very large, complex data sets that are accompanied by detailed metadata. This means that they're most likely downloaded purposefully by someone who has the tools and the technology to manipulate the data and who sees potential benefit from reuse and packaging.
These data sets are complex in nature and as a result the file formats used are not always simple and not always open. We use open standards as much as possible, such as those from the International Organization for Standardization, more commonly known as ISO, or the international Open Geospatial Consortium, more commonly known as OGC, but we also make use of industry standards. Many historical products are only available as scans because that's all we have. Technically, it's not open data, but we make this information publicly available nonetheless.
While the download statistics indicate the geo-data are considered useful, the economic or social impact of geo-data reuse can be difficult to quantify. I also understand that you had a witness from the McKinsey group who also appeared and estimated the value, or at least in the American context identified it, if I remember correctly, as $3 trillion, if I'm not mistaken. Because it is open data, you don't really track the reuse potential all the way to its logical extension, so it's really difficult to quantify that number, but we're trying.
As a result, quantitatively understanding the clients and their level of satisfaction is difficult. Nonetheless, we have received much positive feedback from the clients about what we have available, but they usually want more. Interestingly, we have also seen an increased demand for older, historic products.
Conceptually, we accept that if the original data acquisition was judged to provide value for money, any additional reuse can only compound the benefits. To better understand the impact of open data, we are currently evaluating the impact of open geo-data in the marketplace.
Another area where we're learning lessons is in providing a simple way for users to easily find and access what they want. As more and more data sets become available through single portals, it becomes more difficult for the user to find that needle in the haystack.
In addition to the economic benefits of open data, our statistics show a lot of reuse of the data within the federal family. The ongoing broad-based engagement efforts of the Federal Committee on Geomatics and Earth Observations has been worth it. Current standards and approaches and those under development are the key to enabling accessibility and interoperability of the data and will enable future breakthroughs.
In closing, I want to reiterate that, from NRCan's perspective, our deliberate and intentional move towards open data was not simple, nor was it accomplished in the last few years. In fact, we've been working on it through most of our history, long before the Internet community introduced the phrase to describe the concept. Yet the journey in the Internet age has been definitely worthwhile, and we're beginning to see substantial benefits and new opportunities arising from our efforts.
Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you, and we'd be happy to take any questions.