On the fees, I'll ask my colleague to look for that information.
The cost recovery is done from those who ask us to develop a standard, for instance. Back in the 2010 evaluation of the program, we had already instituted cost recovery, but they asked us to move to a full cost recovery organization. Most of the standards organizations are full cost recovery. They're driven by the fact that there's a particular interest across industry or by a regulator to institute a standard. We ask them to...under the common service policy we have, we recover costs that way.
The majority of our work, since about 2010, has been really refocused on government requirements. There are government departments who require standards for either regulatory purposes or for their particular mandates who ask us to come in and do those standards. Industry will approach us as well in areas where standards are just not viable in terms of the amount of investment to develop those standards. We're often asked to participate in doing that. So we tend to pick up those standards.
I think one of the important things, just to go back to one of the observations in your preamble, is that we have seven recognized standards organizations in Canada. One of the things we work on is to not duplicate the development of standards. We work with other standards organizations to try not to do the same work that others have done. It's costly and it takes a lot of time. Fundamentally, because standards organizations are accredited, they all follow the same process to arrive at the standards. There's no reason to suspect that another standards organization's standards aren't up to quality.
I will take another example—fuel, for instance. The interest that the federal government has on having a fuel standard is that we need fuel for aircraft that the government operates, for example; that fuel is specific to the needs of those kinds of aircraft. Those standards are set so that they can operate in the north in cold-weather environments, in high-humidity environments, and those kinds of things. Because we have to procure that fuel, we want to have a baseline where you then can actually go through a procurement that's not specifying a fuel but saying, “This is the fuel that has to perform to meet our requirements”. That's true of many of the standards we're facing.
On the cost recovery, Desmond has some information.