I can answer fairly quickly on this one.
There's always a risk in everything, but I would have to say that the risk is minimized here. There are two reasons for that.
All of the people participating in the committee—and I think CGSB does a good job at ensuring that this is met and this is well up front in any of the discussions—are very aware that the standard cannot be, or be perceived to be, a barrier to trade.
Secondly, this being said, if we were just to say that we'll adopt a standard from the European Union or a standard from Korea, for example, there would be a real risk, because, at the end of the day, what works well in a Fiat car in Italy will not work in a car in Sudbury. At the end of the day, the standard is there. It's kind of a check and balance to make sure that generally the standards work well. But ultimately, what's specific to Canada has to be addressed by a standard that is Canadian, to make sure that 38 million Canadians and all the drivers have good product in their car and they can feel safe that they will be able to go from point A to point B and not stall on the road in the middle of the winter.