I'd like to bring the committee back to my gear and gearbox thing. We need to.... At least from a QPL standpoint, I would suggest that efforts should be put into engaging that gear properly.
Public Works writes their own purchasing specs for furniture. There is a national standard. Why does Public Works need to write a technical document and have some little.... You can see that 98% of it is the same thing as the national standard, but then you have to go through it with a fine-tooth comb to find out what's different from the national standard when it comes to what Public Works is doing.
Then the feedback we get from Public Works is that they're overwhelmed and they don't have the resources. The resources are there. Use them.
But then when you look at the CGSB, it's.... You're not efficient. You don't have the proper expertise. It's the egg before the chicken and the chicken before the egg. The gearbox won't use the gear because the gear is missing a few teeth. Where do you start to get that process back to where it should be? The idea is good. Again, it brings you back to the image of how they threw out the baby with the dirty water.