That's exactly the type of answer I was looking for, Mr. Lakroni, so I'll interrupt you there. Thank you for the specific answer to a specific question.
Along the same lines, you're asking for $136 million for increases in non-discretionary expenses. Can I ask, with regard to crown-owned buildings, leases, etc., why we are so far off in non-discretionary items? Could we not have anticipated and foreseen...? For the other category I can see this, but it should be pretty predictable and pretty accurate.