First of all, there are two parts of the legislation. I think it's important to look at that.
There's the administrative burden that can be added with a regulatory amendment. It doesn't have to be a new title of a regulation. If a regulation is advanced that's an amendment to an existing regulation, we look at the administrative burden and how that can be reduced. That balance can be carried forward, as I mentioned earlier.
The second component is if a new title is introduced, a new regulatory framework. In Health Canada that doesn't happen often, so we don't actually have new titles that are added. But once a new title is added, it's at that point that a regulatory framework has to be removed within the two-year period. As I mentioned earlier, that has to be across the portfolio.
In the two-year forward plan—and we actually do forward planning that goes beyond that—we look at new regulatory amendments that may increase or reduce burden, and then also new titles, and then from that is the requirement to look for a repeal. It's not that it happens very quickly or overnight.
That's the process that we follow.