Thanks. I'll take that as a correction on my behalf as well. Protection is the word I should have used, as opposed to exempt.
I just wanted to close by saying that in regard to the Fisheries Act, which my colleague from the Liberal Party brought up, through regulatory amendments Fisheries and Oceans Canada is already part of that environment. It has already provided fisheries with over $150,000 in administrative burden relief by eliminating rules that require fishers to identify their fishing gear and vessels by using marking devices supplied by the regulators, the department. That's just one area where duplication can certainly be an administrative burden.
I just wanted to see if you have any comments in regard to the comment made by the CFIB in regard to the fact that political leadership was one of the three areas they felt needed to be included in this and to take a lead on it, as opposed to what I heard one of the other presenters say, that regulators should be the ones in charge of the regulations as well. I do know that the people in the departments and that sort of thing are going to have to be the ones who will take a look at some of these issues as well and deal with the regulations.
Could you comment on how important it is to have political leadership in moving these issues forward as well for savings for Canadians?