Yes, I can speak to that.
I think the big difference between doing a review and getting rid of unnecessary regulation—and that has been done from time to time over the course of Canadian history—is it's a one-time event. The one-for-one rule makes this an ongoing process, something that needs to be focused on all the time. It also starts to quantify in a way that we haven't quantified before. Those would be the two big things.
I think that businesses get very frustrated with governments when red tape reform is a flavour of the month, that it is the focus for a little while. They want it to be like fiscal accountability, a permanent feature on the menu. I think the one-for-one rule starts to do that.