It seems strange that subjects such as health and safety are mentioned, but not the environment. Indeed, there is a clear link between the environment and Canadians' health as well as their safety. Here on the opposition side, we would have appreciated that the environment be taken into account.
I would like to ask you a more specific question.
Under the one-for-one rule, regulatory entities must compensate for new burdens within two years of the final approval of regulatory amendments.
Is that two-year deadline difficult to meet?