Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I haven't heard anything that's convincing about why the one-for-one rule is somehow better than just having a government study about those regulations that cause red tape, that might be redundant, and then simply eliminating or deleting them. It seems like that could have been the approach.
At least in my sense of small and medium-sized businesses in my riding, I don't think they care how the red tape is got rid of but that it is gotten rid of.
Can either of you, Madame Jones or Madame Coombs, speak to the one-for-one rule as opposed to another way of going about reducing red tape?