Presumably you could do that. You could build in a review process that isn't direct and one-for-one, right? What you're saying doesn't necessarily mean a one-for-one rule; it could be an ongoing process. We have continuous improvement processes across the public service, so it could be a yearly review of red tape and red tape elimination. It doesn't have to be a one-for-one process.
On December 2nd, 2014. See this statement in context.