Right.
I had the opportunity to work with a constituent who had concerns regarding a crown corporation once. The issue was resolved with the help of the office prior to your taking over, but it created for me some questions as to just what the process looks like.
Obviously, there will be complaints that come to your office from time to time with a range of allegations, some with regard to behaviour within an office, some with regard to ethical issues, and some possibly with regard to criminal wrongdoing. Obviously, within that there would be other organizations, I suspect, that you would work with—possibly the Auditor General—if it were ever seen to be a systematic defrauding of taxpayers' dollars. The other would obviously be criminal justice organizations, such as the RCMP or police forces in some cases.
Could you explain to me how the process unfolds? Obviously, you wouldn't be left to conduct investigations of wrongdoing if they got so complex, or if they went into the area of criminal wrongdoing. Is that the case? Would you do a cursory assessment and then pass it on? How would that work?