I can't speak directly to your question but I do have some context that may be helpful to you, so let me take a stab at that.
As I said, the work of the RCC started in December 2011. It started because there was a fair amount of common ground between the two countries in having highly evolved regulatory systems. Here we are in May 2015, and I think the folks at PCO would tell you that they've learned lessons out of this exercise. They've obviously worked with their American counterparts, but they've also worked closely with industry in both countries.
First of all, they've learned that relationships, coordination, and planning matter, so in both the initial action plan in 2011 and in the forward action plan announced last August, you're going to see an emphasis on that. Following on that, it's really important to work together to pick and choose the priority areas of work and then take a comprehensive approach. When I was here before, I talked about the 29 working groups, and this time I'm talking about 24 areas of broad regulation.
It's not by chance.
These are conscious choices of areas that folks across the board want to work on because they think that they can make real differences, and I gave a couple of areas of possibility with paint and lipstick earlier.
Stakeholders are key, which means that transparency is a must, so you're going to always see posted on various websites updates on what's happening. For instance, the stakeholders met, I believe, in the fall to talk—and you're always going to hear what we heard and what we discussed. I think that's helpful in having conversations with other stakeholders.
Finally, one of the big lessons learned when you're working on this kind of structural progress is that you need a high level of commitment, which is why our organization and the RCC is based out of PCO. It reflects the government's priority on this, and in the United States it's based out of the White House. There's attention being focused on government-to-government considerations on perhaps less interesting but really important things like information-sharing and funding mechanisms. When push comes to shove, how are we actually going to work together?