Thank you.
In order to change the financial system, internal control would have to be re-established.
That would prevent a government from overspending its allocation. So if you think right now the controls are based on, as I mentioned earlier, capital, operating, and grants and contributions, and if a department puts a transaction into its financial system that would cause it to exceed those amounts, the system would either prevent it or set a warning to stop that from happening.
The Government of Canada has an excellent track record. Departments do not exceed their votes by Parliament because of those systems.
If we're changing the basis of control to strategic outcome, redoing the Appropriation Act for Parliament is the simple part. What has to happen behind the scenes is to reprogram the financial systems to put those controls on strategic outcomes.
Given that each department has their own financial system, more or less, you are involved in reprogramming 125 financial systems to actually make those changes.
The final point that's attached to it is right now departments estimate what they will spend on strategic outcome and program, and they make their best efforts for those estimates. If you're changing the basis of control for Parliament to be based on strategic outcome, those estimates must be extremely accurate because it's the basis for control. So we would want to give departments some time to make sure they have really developed those estimates with as much accuracy as possible, given that Parliament would then be voting on those things.