You asked two questions.
The first has to do with capital. If the government were to review its spending, most of the cuts would be to operating expenditures.
If you look at the planned spending on capital, you will not see a drastic difference between current years and previous years. It's a very good thing to keep an eye on, because there is always the question when one is reducing spending whether you are reducing in the short term and will incur some costs later on. Keeping a close eye on capital spending is a good thing to do.
The second question was on the severance. The actual fiscal liability for the severance has already been booked, because the Department of Finance and accounting standards would dictate that we have to recognize the benefits employees earned. They were entitled to it, so it was already reflected in the books. The liability exists on the books already.
What we're seeing now is simply cash going out the door that will reduce the liability. The $955 million is the estimate that has been made for the current fiscal year in terms of how many employees will request cash. It's an estimate and is based on past practice.
Our first estimates when we first did this were based on the experience of Canada Post, because they did a similar program. I think their experience was that 75% of employees took the money up front. Our experience to date is a little bit less, but really, this is a matter of cashflow, and not a matter of something affecting the bottom line of the government.