The amount we're transferring is in the neighbourhood of $170 million, but I could maybe speak to the root of the issue, which is the unspent amounts if you look on a government-wide basis in terms of what was not spent in the year 2012-13.
We're only dealing on the voted amounts here, not the statutory, and it's in the neighbourhood of just over $10 billion in authority that was available that was not spent. That's roughly about 10.3%. If you are curious about what the previous year looked like, 2011-12 would have been about $9.5 billion. It was more than we're used to.
That is not abnormal in a time when departments are still implementing budget cuts. Because it's illegal to overspend your vote, departments tend to be very careful, and rightfully so. It's not uncommon to see large lapses, as we call them, in times of budget cuts. The key question for me when I looked at that—there's really two types of unspent money—is whether it was planned or unplanned.
To give you a very simple example, in main estimates there was money that is in departments' reference levels. The budget came along after main estimates, and it reduced the amount of money that each department could spend on travel. That money was already in departments' reference levels, so it was already out there. Basically, we then prevent departments from spending that money. We call that a planned lapse because that's money they have available that they're no longer allowed to spend. That's easy to explain. It was about half of the unspent funds last year that were what we call “planned”.
With regard to the other half, I'd be happy to go into detail in terms of explaining what that is.