I've had a few.
The CITT, on the procurement side, you have to remember, is really a domestic tribunal. The word “international” is a bit of a misnomer. Actually, at one point, when NAFTA came on board, the procurement review board was the body that was doing the procurement review, and that was absorbed by the CITT. There was an amendment to the NAFTA implementation bill, which didn't get through at the last moment, that would have had the name of the CITT changed to the “Canadian international trade and procurement review board”. That would have been a better descriptor of what we're doing.
What we do, in effect, is provide another forum for dispute settlement in the procurement field. A supplier can always go to the Federal Court or to the superior courts of the provinces to make essentially the same claim against the federal government, but just using the contract A/contract B paradigm of the Ron Engineering decision.
That law that was developed by the Supreme Court is essentially embodied inside the trade agreements as well. What the CITT provides is an easier, quicker forum for those types of settlements.
We track a lot of things. My executive director and general counsel is a former management consultant, so he's very big on metrics, and so am I. I almost became an accountant instead of a lawyer.