In general, I covered off coverage, but there are all those procedural rules that I had in my opening statement, a plethora of procedural rules. Each of them has to be adhered to—timelines, so on and so forth.
In terms of the CITT, I did bring stats with me just to show you PSPC's robust system. In terms of results, 0.3% of PSPC's contracts go before the CITT, and 0.03% result in determinations of valid or valid in part. Over an average of three years, 130 complaints based on PSPC contracts actually go to the CITT. Of those, then, as I indicated to you in part, 0.03% are found to be valid.
I don't know what the stats are, but it's a very rare occurrence that Canada will be taken to the WTO for a dispute settlement resolution. What that means is, one, through PSPC's robust mechanisms, we're basically avoiding them; we're making sure that we're attending to all the procedural fairness elements before they even get there. Two, the CITT, as well as our Office of the Procurement Ombudsman, takes care of the complaints and makes sure that they're tended to well before they get to the WTO.
What I'm missing in my response is that there's also an opportunity to avail themselves of the federal court system. There are a number of appeals before the Federal Court.