I'll take a stab at this. I'm not familiar with the specifics of the bill, so I can't comment on whether or not it would be consistent with our trade obligations. I would just say that when you speak of community benefits as you've described them, it's not clear to me what exactly that would mean, but it sounds as though it is what we would call an “offset”.
We have a prohibition on offsets. Offsets are any conditions that would provide preferential treatment for local content or conditions. For example, an arrangement to hire local people would be an offset. These are carved out of our trade agreements, but there's a lot of scope to do things within the context of our trade agreements. It really depends on the specifics of the procurement.