One of the things that always struck me as a strange threshold—and perhaps your statistical analysis will help us with this—is that in order for a business to be considered aboriginal there needs to be 51% control, but only one-third of the employees need to be indigenous.
In terms of measuring the impact of the economic benefit to indigenous communities, it goes beyond just whether or not the business is indigenous-controlled, obviously. It's what percentage of the salaries is paid to workers from those communities, and what percentage of the profits is returned to the communities.
Do you do additional statistical analysis beyond the threshold to determine whether or not a business is actually leveraging, and how much they're leveraging, the value of these federal contracts for their indigenous communities, because I would like to see something more detailed than whether or not it's aboriginal. I'd like to know how much of the salaries are being paid to aboriginal workers.