Wow. We heard that. It's the same with indigenous.... There are audits once in a while, but there is no pre-clearance.
I do want to touch upon that, because I've asked other witnesses this. With the indigenous and with women it's based on ownership, but what would actually benefit society more? Would it be a figurehead like you owning it, but perhaps Allan doing all the work and the profit, or would it be a pro-rated scale that would deliver...? Maybe a gentleman owns it, but he's employing a majority of women in leadership roles. How do we set that up to best serve society as a whole, to not just tick a box and say, “Look, we have women ownership”?