I'm not so sure I would agree with that. First, we need to analyze what agreements, including CETA or CFTA, apply to a particular procurement. Once that decision is made, we look at the procurement and the requirements and look to see what indigenous benefits could be provided. If indigenous benefits could be provided, then we set that aside for the purposes of that agreement. Therefore the value of the contract, if it's set aside in whole, does not come into play.
What come into play are specific policy considerations, for example, that are applicable under the procurement strategy for aboriginal business, ensuring that it's a mandatory voluntary set-aside and those criteria apply.