I'm going to answer in English, if you don't mind.
In terms of independence, that's a great question. That's one of the primary issues that I had upon assuming the role, because there is an interrelationship between the ombudsman's office and the department, so I was adamant to make sure that regardless, not only in optics but also in practical aspects, this independence in maintained. I can assure you, though I'm only two weeks into the role, that this independence is in fact maintained.
In terms of the role from the mandate perspective, the mandate is preserved, and there is no oversight capacity on the part of the department. That role is untouched by the department. It's only in issues for administrative purposes, such as information technology and human resources, where the department has any direct liaison with the procurement ombudsman's office. Therefore, in terms of priority-setting, the ombudsman's office is clear to set its own priorities without any implications from the department itself.
In terms of what I can do to enhance that independence, again, one of the things that I intend to do is transparency. Transparent behaviour is a fundamental underpinning of the importance of the ombudsman's office. Therefore, as one of the things we look to do, specifically on reviews of complaints, we anticipate now publishing a more fulsome document, which includes additional factors that currently aren't being published. This will further allow for additional oversight from the outside world beyond the department itself.