Okay. So the same candidates were run through the parallel process and there was a lower screen-in rate. That is definitely an interesting outcome.
Minister Brison, either at this committee or another committee, had talked about the name-blind hiring process. He had pointed to information from other jurisdictions where name-blind hiring had a salutary effect on the hiring of candidates from visible minority groups. Do you guys have any sense as to why this pilot program didn't produce comparable results? Do you think that this is a strong counter-example to other research out there or that this doesn't really speak to the authority of research done in other jurisdictions?