The next part is that, again, I want to state, as I have stated to you before, that the current government and the previous government have done an excellent job. It's a success story, and it should be heard, as we only hear the bad stuff. It has been a success story in the hiring. But I do note that, just on an off chance just a couple of months ago, I filed an Order Paper about the cost of the project, and it was almost $200,000.
That's what I'm getting at. Why would we spend $200,000 of taxpayers' money when the proof is clear that this has been a success story and current and previous governments have done a great job and it's improving and on the right track? I'm just curious; did we spend the $200,000 for a real purpose without doing the research, or was it a real need? Has someone brought forth some real shortfalls that somehow aren't reflected in the statistics, or is this going on in the government and it has to be corrected?