In general, one could say that from an occupational category we are covering a lot. We are covering the comprehensive, and on classification it looks like we're covering different levels.
Coming specifically to table 6, when you look at the traditional versus the name-blind recruitment, we've gone from 46.3% under operational, for example, to 36% under name-blind. As I look at it, there seems to be a large statistical difference. The other ones are averaging probably about 3% to 5%. Why is there such a significant difference? Compare it with table 8, which is specifically talking about visible minorities. There's almost no statistical difference. I'm trying to reconcile this. Why is there such a statistical difference in one category? When it comes to visible minority, I don't have any statistical variance.