I appreciate where you're coming from. Some of the most successful public sector pension funds I think have huge holdings in real estate, for example, which I think by most standards would be considered risky as opposed to a bond or something, and generally speaking, they're probably less risky than other things in that the return seems to always be growing. In that sense these might be why things like teachers' pensions are so successful and well-funded because of the investment decisions they're making.
Is there that capacity at the federal pension level for the investment decisions to be made with a goal of funding the pension, but also not making it too risky?