Fair enough.
Have you talked to the Public Sector Pension Investment Board? It's their job to ensure that our pensions are actually stable and funded. It's their job to ensure that the risk is reduced? Have you spoken to them? I was looking at the chief actuary's report on the MPs' pension plan, and I saw it as being properly funded, so I guess there is a difference in opinion. Would you answer that question on that Public Sector Pension Investment Board?
Before 2000 the Canada pension plan was totally underfunded and it took the genius of Paul Martin to fund it for 75 years. Should we be using that methodology?