I think that's unfortunate to hear, because that's exactly the kind of commitment I think those people are owed. The delivery of the mail and the profits of Canada Post were not suspended for five weeks. It makes no sense to me why your government would choose, in the back-to-work legislation, not only to agree with the decision in the first place, but then to protect the company, within your government's legislation, from having the union be able to take any action retroactively. That's what section 6 of your agreement does.
Why was that provision included in the back-to-work legislation?