Thank you. I'll continue my question.
I'm looking at the energy services acquisition program. I'm looking at what the government states, which is that when it greens itself, because of real property or real estate contributing 89%, it wants to cut the GHGs by 40%. Some of that will be done by basically introducing smart buildings, using low-temperature hot water and switching from steam to electric chillers. This is technology and innovation.
I'm sure there are conflicting.... We listen to every side. Whether it's the opposition, the government or whatever, we do listen to all sides.
I'm trying to get my head around what you stated. From what I can see, it states that when you move from steam to low-temperature hot water, that action will reduce greenhouse emissions by 63%. It could be a matter of debate. It could be a matter of scientific research. I have worked with just about everyone, and I'm trying to get their sense. I've heard you.
I'd like Mr. Wayland's input into this. It would be important because you talked about how the 80 buildings we have in the capital region could be made more energy-efficient through A, B, C, D and E. Your insight would be important—and the insight of you ladies would be very important as well—in order for me to understand what we are talking about.
Who would like to go first?