—which corresponded to the relatively low amount of spending that we've traditionally seen under vote 10—was that there was more emphasis on strategic management initiatives that are about changing or improving the way departments manage their business. That actually had a kind of management-specific meaning. It seems to me that there has been a widening of the definition of what counts as a government-wide initiative that corresponds to a massive increase in the amount of funding that's being requested under the vote. It's not exactly clear to me when that definition changed, nor is it clear to me how some of the things you just mentioned are under vote 10 are substantially different from some of the new budget items that are also across departments.
If you look—and I'm sorry I don't have a great example for you right now, but I'm sure you can find some—you'll see that even under Treasury Board, ensuring proper payments for public servants is a cross-departmental initiative. We'll find that line in other departmental estimates. It's likewise with advancing gender equality.
Why are those just not under government-wide initiatives then? On the definition you've just given us for government-wide initiatives, it seems that would be an appropriate place for them to lie.
What are the criteria that distinguish those new budget items that are appearing in separate departmental estimates versus the ones that appear under government-wide initiatives?