Okay.
Thank you both for being here.
You said you hadn't read the report but you have read the recommendations of the report, which is quite interesting.
In terms of Canada Post, you talked about the task force. The task force was mandated to create a discussion paper. Our job as a committee is to go out and get input. If they had made any recommendations—they could make suggestions—then it would really defeat the purpose. So just to put it on the record, that was their job. Their job was not to tell us what to do. Their job was to advise us: here is what we have seen; Canada Post is not sustainable in its current format. And if it's not sustainable in its current format....
You have made a few suggestions. I think those suggestions are good to explore, because you've given us some ideas. You talked about the hub of services. You must have thought it through. Explain to me in very short terms how you would expect somebody to pay for those services. Are you saying that it should operate like a Service Canada concept, so that the immigration minister, let's say, or the minister responsible for border security, or whichever minister, could probably have their services, such as the passport service probably, provided by Canada Post, the current hubs? Is that what you're suggesting?