Excellent.
Mr. Mazer, thanks so much for your comments on the Canada Post pension plan and the distinction between the going concern versus solvency valuation. I think a lot of the debate about the future of Canada Post has been driven by this bogeyman of a $6-billion unfunded liability. I've certainly tried to make the point at this committee that the number is entirely based on a solvency valuation, which is based on pretty extreme assumptions that don't really apply to Canada Post.
I wonder if you could perhaps explain that it would be a reasonable thing, from an actuarial and an accounting point of view, to exempt Canada Post from those solvency payments.