Your presentation has been a 360° turn, and this is interesting. I have a question that has a yes and no answer.
Canada Post, for the most part, is the fabric of Canada. It's a national symbol connecting communities. In your presentation, you look at it as both a business and a service, so it has to provide a service.
You stated that politics may be involved in the decisions. We have listened to a lot of presentations. Sometimes it may be politics that cause issues where depots are moved from, say, Windsor to Toronto, so that the mail goes from Windsor to Toronto to be sent to Winnipeg. That's nonsense.
Letting Pitney Bowes keep stamp prices at 85¢ while Canada Post charges one dollar—I think you heard the previous presentation there. Comparative advantages are not there, and it's management's decision. Whether management was trying to privatize it or what its mandate was in the previous government, we don't know. We just want to move forward.
You've been listening to the task force, and the task force has made certain recommendations. You also have seniors in your communities who will need special delivery, but some of the premise that you base it on—and I'm going to talk about financial sustainability—is that we were told by many that Canada Post management did not think outside the box. There are tactics that you can adopt from different parts of the world, and they didn't. They focused on financial sustainability. I therefore picked up their financial statements....
You are a mayor. Would you manage your assets and liabilities based on an ongoing concern or on insolvency?