Sure, I can do it in less, and being a “W”, I'm not actually used to going first.
I'm just going by script, and the following is my own opinion. Time didn't permit for a formal input by council as a whole. I just wanted to state that.
I want to compliment the task force on its comprehensive working paper, “Canada Post in the Digital Age”. It's really well balanced and reflective of the positions of all stakeholders. I thought it was really well done.
My input is based on the belief that, separate from political interference into the strategic planning efforts of the 2,500 executive and management team members employed at Canada Post, this task force is truly committed to a fair and balanced study on the provision of “quality services to meet the needs of Canadians at a reasonable price in a financially self-sustainable manner”. I'm going on that premise, and your financial situation is not lost on me. That's a tough one.
At a high-level view, Canadians recognize that the volume of mail has been decreasing for some time. To a lesser extent, Canadians understand that Canada Post is facing financial pressures that threaten its long-term survival. This is on page 33 under “Recognition of Systemic Pressures”.
Using your conservative 2026 projections of annual losses amounting to $721 million per year from this year's $63 million annual loss, you are really headed in the same direction as the United States Postal Service, which regularly loses about $5 billion a year.
While the hard work of developing and honing the technology and tactical processes used in streamlining the collection, sorting, distribution, and tracking of mail is largely complete in the industry, one thing that hasn't changed is the fact that the post office has to do just one thing, and that is to deliver the mail each day. It is laborious work, I'm sure.
More and more Canadians recognize that the system is not sustainable in its present form, yet we are loath to make changes because we are creatures of habit. Canadian hockey only changed when it was forced to after 1972, for those of you old enough to remember. Do we have the political will to do what's necessary in 2016 to save and stabilize Canadian mail for the long term?
Band-aid solutions solutions have not worked here or in the rest of the world over the past few decades. I'm hoping that you will opt for both/and solutions instead of either/or solutions. For example, one, don't do as the American government does. They provide bailout funds every so often, which only serves to prolong the agony. I did note that Canada Post has deferred $1.4 billion in solvency payments related to pension funding in 2015.
Two, don't be tempted to try adding new public services with such an expensive and non-competitive workforce, as illustrated in your working paper.
Three, move to a community mailbox and a franchise model at high-volume corporate post offices over the next few years.
Four, implement alternate-day delivery and add a day or two to the time it takes for a letter to get to destination as the de facto standard across the country, placing a premium on faster service for those who want it.
Five, adopt other marketing and advertising strategies as laid out in your paper. I'm sure you're not waiting for someone to give you the green light to do what makes sense. Also, promote the strategic advantages of Canada Post over customs brokers for cross-border and international shippers.
Now for small-town Dryden, my primary obligation is to the citizens of Dryden, of course, specifically those who would be negatively impacted by any form of reduced services from the current model. What follows is a suggestion on how to meet the postal needs of all Canadian towns and cities in a financially self-sustainable manner, and it's just two bullets and three subs, so it's really short.
Create a model around the 80% or 90%—I don't know the numbers; you can do a survey or a proper study—of Canadians who can walk or drive to a community mailbox. Those with mobility problems should receive door-to-door mail either for free or at a premium price, depending on the political will of Parliament. If at a premium, pensioners and low-income earners would receive a credit on their income tax. Door-to-door delivery would be on alternate days.
I just want to note that I pick up my mail at a community mailbox. It's an opportunity to socialize if I feel inclined, and my mail is also more secure this way when I'm away for a few days. People can break into anything, if they want to, but it's a lot harder when it's in a locked box.
Fixed costs will stay high for years due to inflexible contracts, meaning that you need to tackle these issues immediately. My suggestions likely won't get you to the break-even point, but will go a long way in making deficits and total debt more manageable.
Thank you.