Well, as I've said, it's really up to the will of the committee how members wish to proceed. If this committee wants me to write to PROC referring this whole issue to it, I can certainly do that. If this committee wants to discuss the change and the relative benefits, if there are any, of such a change, this committee can do that.
With respect to your initial comments, my understanding—and we can ask for commentary from the rest of the committee—is that everyone on the committee thought that the better alignment was a good idea. There were, however, questions about changing the date in the Standing Orders to May 1. Mr. McCauley raised a couple of concerns, and I think there may be others. I think everyone is on the same page as to what the minister wants to do as an end result; it's just how to get there, and whether changing the date to May 1 is the proper way to do it or not.