There's an old labour board saying that labour relations delayed are labour relations defeated and denied, and that applies in this case as well, so tighter timelines would be better. I could give you examples of timelines that we're dealing with on cases that are years and years old and we are still not even at the tribunal yet.
The concern that I have though with very specified timelines is that oftentimes things arise and you need more time and an extension is legitimate, and having too tight a timeline might encourage investigations to be less thorough and less effective, and you wouldn't be able to look at as much evidence as you might. Remember that as part of the investigative process the commissioner is sometimes able to get evidence that will be helpful to use down the road when you actually go to the tribunal. The complainant doesn't have that opportunity. They're just sitting there waiting for the evidence to come to them. Missing out on that opportunity at the start could harm the case down the road.