That's why I'm kind of playing the devil's advocate.
For the past three weeks, a number of witnesses have told us that the act is not always working as it should be and that a lot of whistleblowers are not properly protected. Based on your figures, a number of people said they were subject to reprisal, but you told them that it wasn't the case.
Ultimately, perhaps the act is not as bad as it seems. It is also important to prevent public servants from starting to think that, when their superior tells them to act in a certain way, it is a reprisal. There's also authority in public service and it is important to be able to exercise it.
Is the act as bad as that? In a number of your decisions, you told public servants that they were not victims of reprisal.