It would simply be the private or confidential nature of whistle-blowing.
I think it's important to remember that we are a neutral, investigative, independent agent of Parliament; we're not an advocacy group. As I said, we don't represent a whistle-blower. As I often say, I don't advocate on behalf of a whistle-blower; I advocate on behalf of the act of whistle-blowing. We have to be careful in recognizing and respecting how our office has been created as an investigative, neutral body, not representing one side or the other.