Thank you, and thanks, Mr. Ferguson, for being here too.
From some of your recommendations, it's clear that you're limited in what you can do under this act, but I think the purpose of the act is to ensure that when complainants and employees witness what they believe is wrongdoing, they can come forward without fear of reprisal. The purpose is to make sure we have an effective public service and that people who are conducting themselves in a manner that can be defined as wrongdoing aren't profiting from that and aren't able to thrive in the public service.
Those two goals are laudable. I think we can all agree on that, but the question is how to get there.
In your review, do you see this act as being the only means? I know Mr. Chamberlain would like all complaints to go to PSIC and believes that this would be an appropriate solution. You mentioned that there should be a different resolution process. I believe that was what you said, that there should be a different avenue for complainants beyond what's in the act.
Can you expand on that?