Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank the witnesses for being here this morning. I'll ask my questions in French. If you need earphones to listen to the simultaneous interpretation, don't hesitate to use them.
It's troubling. It has been a big morning. That's what I can say after listening to the previous witnesses and to Mr. Korosec describe a personal experience. Thank you for meeting with us.
At the same time, I remember the presentations given last week, when we met with the Commissioner and with RCMP and Public Services and Procurement Canada representatives. We asked the witnesses questions about the many whistleblower cases. We have the table and we've seen statistics in this regard.
My view is as follows. I wrote “the code of silence.” I heard it earlier. I've heard a bit about this type of thing. However, when we ask people, we're told that it wasn't what was said. People tell us that we must refer to the collective agreements, because there are different ways to raise and solve issues.
I'll go back to the basic principle, which is respect for anonymity when a disclosure is made. This obviously seems to be a big issue. Afterward, there's talk about the accountability of people who are singled out or investigated.
How do you see the issue of respect for anonymity in Canada in relation to the services here and in relation to other countries, where this doesn't seem to be the case and where anonymity appears to be less of a problem?
Ms. Daviau and Mr. Rousseau, do you have anything to say on the matter?