Thanks. That's extremely helpful, because one of the questions our committee has been asking of the central whistle-blower protection authorities has been why so few cases actually come to the tribunal. I think you suggest that there may be a lack of direct access to that tribunal, but the response we've often gotten is that these problems are being handled at the agency or departmental level. We really have no way of measuring that, so I think that direct reporting from departments and agencies to some kind of central body seems to be a key part of a better architecture.
I also wanted to ask you about public recognition of whistle-blowers. Is this something that you think is useful? Is it something that you think should be embedded in the Canadian regime?