Okay, that's helpful, because I was going to ask next whether there was one you would commend to us as one of the best. That appears to be the answer to that question, so I appreciate that.
We as a committee have been reviewing this for a few sessions now, and we've heard a lot of testimony and a lot of opinions, suggestions, and actually, experiences. Some whistle-blowers have come and testified. The biggest surprise reaction I've seen so far has been your suggestion that this legislation should be replaced and we should go back to square one. We certainly appreciate the candour of that opinion.
If that were the case, should we base it, maybe, on the Australian Capital Territory legislation, as you said, or are there four or five components that you think are fundamental to having an effective piece of whistle-blower legislation?