I think that if the law is an effective law, a legitimate whistle-blower protection law, then you test it by seeing how it's working. If there was a need to review it, then you can take measures to undertake that. But the first order of business is to get a law in place that is our best effort, follows best practices, and then to let it do its work. I have no strong views about imposing a statutory review in the law. I think that if it is imposed and not necessary, it could waste a lot of public money. I think that you test to see how the law is working through real-life examples of whistle-blowing.
On March 21st, 2017. See this statement in context.